Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy: Porovnání verzí
Poslední komentář: před 9 lety od uživatele Sweepy v tématu „Sources of your data changes“
Smazaný obsah Přidaný obsah
m →Sources of your data changes: warning 2 |
|||
| Řádek 24: | Řádek 24: | ||
::::Hi, I found and corrected it. Regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 10:24 (CEST) |
::::Hi, I found and corrected it. Regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 10:24 (CEST) |
||
::::Hello Sweepy. In my point of view, most of your contributions use false referencing. [http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/evropa/150317-video-motiv-krvave-strelby-ve-finsku-nenavist-k-lidstvu.html This article] in Czech neither provide such information as population, density or estimated area of the city, nor refers to something in 2014 as it was published and last checked in September 2008. Maybe it is just the fact, you don't understand the language you are trying to contribute in but please note that your edits in this content do not improve our project at all, in fact I would call them quite dangerous as they lower our level of verifiability and credibility. Please stop contributing in this way unless you are really confident in what you do. Further problems might lead to temporary (or permanent) edit block. Thank you --[[Wikipedista:Mates|Mates]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Mates|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 15:07 (CEST) |
::::Hello Sweepy. In my point of view, most of your contributions use false referencing. [http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/evropa/150317-video-motiv-krvave-strelby-ve-finsku-nenavist-k-lidstvu.html This article] in Czech neither provide such information as population, density or estimated area of the city, nor refers to something in 2014 as it was published and last checked in September 2008. Maybe it is just the fact, you don't understand the language you are trying to contribute in but please note that your edits in this content do not improve our project at all, in fact I would call them quite dangerous as they lower our level of verifiability and credibility. Please stop contributing in this way unless you are really confident in what you do. Further problems might lead to temporary (or permanent) edit block. Thank you --[[Wikipedista:Mates|Mates]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Mates|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 15:07 (CEST) |
||
:::::Hello Mates, I#m very astonished about your words! Its wondering because most of dates have no references and this was/is o.k.? Ad hoc p.e. [[Paderborn]] and very more. Where do you see references? Why accept you this? Where are your edit blocks? I can tell you hundreds examples of this. As mentioned above, I'm very wondering about your threat...Regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 18:44 (CEST) |
|||
Verze z 28. 4. 2015, 18:44
Welcome to Czech Wikipedia!Hello! Welcome to Czech Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Czech language. Thank you for logging in and for your contributions. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good links for newcomers:
- If you need to ask any questions, visit our Village Pump.
- Don't speak Czech? Our embassy will help you!
- Do you need a flag for your bot? You can request it.
- In case you want to contact any of our administrators or bureaucrats directly, look at the contact list.
We are looking forward to seeing you here more often! Again, welcome!
Mluvíte česky? Prosím, podívejte se na uvítací zprávu v češtině. • Говорите по русски? Прочитайте сообщение на русском.
--Horst (diskuse) 21. 4. 2015, 11:14 (CEST)
Sources of your data changes
Hi, you are making lots of small data changes to infoboxes of various articles (like Autonomní provincie Bolzano or Prostějov). From which sources are you taking all that new data? --27. 4. 2015, 17:26 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)
- Hi Utar, the dates are from the German-WP. Regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 27. 4. 2015, 23:17 (CEST)
- Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when you change data and leave an old reference with it – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)
- Hello Utar, will you be so kind to look at Kauhajoki. What did I wrong in the infobox at Obyvatel with the reference? Thanks and regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 09:52 (CEST)
- Hi, I found and corrected it. Regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 10:24 (CEST)
- Hello Sweepy. In my point of view, most of your contributions use false referencing. This article in Czech neither provide such information as population, density or estimated area of the city, nor refers to something in 2014 as it was published and last checked in September 2008. Maybe it is just the fact, you don't understand the language you are trying to contribute in but please note that your edits in this content do not improve our project at all, in fact I would call them quite dangerous as they lower our level of verifiability and credibility. Please stop contributing in this way unless you are really confident in what you do. Further problems might lead to temporary (or permanent) edit block. Thank you --Mates (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 15:07 (CEST)
- Hello Mates, I#m very astonished about your words! Its wondering because most of dates have no references and this was/is o.k.? Ad hoc p.e. Paderborn and very more. Where do you see references? Why accept you this? Where are your edit blocks? I can tell you hundreds examples of this. As mentioned above, I'm very wondering about your threat...Regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 18:44 (CEST)
- Hello Utar, will you be so kind to look at Kauhajoki. What did I wrong in the infobox at Obyvatel with the reference? Thanks and regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 09:52 (CEST)
- Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when you change data and leave an old reference with it – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)