Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy: Porovnání verzí
Poslední komentář: před 9 lety od uživatele Sweepy v tématu „Sources of your data changes“
Smazaný obsah Přidaný obsah
→Sources of your data changes: re Sweepy |
|||
| Řádek 21: | Řádek 21: | ||
:Hi Utar, the dates are from the German-WP. Regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 27. 4. 2015, 23:17 (CEST) |
:Hi Utar, the dates are from the German-WP. Regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 27. 4. 2015, 23:17 (CEST) |
||
:: Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when [https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rokycany&diff=prev&oldid=12543886 you change data and leave an old reference with it] – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), [[Wikipedista:Utar|Utar]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Utar|diskuse]]) |
:: Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when [https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rokycany&diff=prev&oldid=12543886 you change data and leave an old reference with it] – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), [[Wikipedista:Utar|Utar]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Utar|diskuse]]) |
||
:::Hello Utar, will you be so kind to look at [[Kauhajoki]]. What did I wrong in the infobox at Obyvatel with the reference? Thanks and regards -- [[Wikipedista:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[Diskuse s wikipedistou:Sweepy|diskuse]]) 28. 4. 2015, 09:52 (CEST) |
|||
Verze z 28. 4. 2015, 09:52
Welcome to Czech Wikipedia!Hello! Welcome to Czech Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Czech language. Thank you for logging in and for your contributions. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good links for newcomers:
- If you need to ask any questions, visit our Village Pump.
- Don't speak Czech? Our embassy will help you!
- Do you need a flag for your bot? You can request it.
- In case you want to contact any of our administrators or bureaucrats directly, look at the contact list.
We are looking forward to seeing you here more often! Again, welcome!
Mluvíte česky? Prosím, podívejte se na uvítací zprávu v češtině. • Говорите по русски? Прочитайте сообщение на русском.
--Horst (diskuse) 21. 4. 2015, 11:14 (CEST)
Sources of your data changes
Hi, you are making lots of small data changes to infoboxes of various articles (like Autonomní provincie Bolzano or Prostějov). From which sources are you taking all that new data? --27. 4. 2015, 17:26 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)
- Hi Utar, the dates are from the German-WP. Regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 27. 4. 2015, 23:17 (CEST)
- Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when you change data and leave an old reference with it – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)
- Hello Utar, will you be so kind to look at Kauhajoki. What did I wrong in the infobox at Obyvatel with the reference? Thanks and regards -- Sweepy (diskuse) 28. 4. 2015, 09:52 (CEST)
- Can you transfer also references if there are any at dewiki and you can check that info is somewhere in it? Or, at the very least, start using edit summary and add something like "data from dewiki" there? So many edits with little number changes and without any note of source get to seem like silent vandalism pretty soon. Also, please, try do not do such edits when you change data and leave an old reference with it – that leads to false referencing. Thanks. --27. 4. 2015, 23:29 (CEST), Utar (diskuse)