Wikipedista:Tomas62/Funus

|accessdate=28 October 2012|language=Russian}}</ref> Mallets, hammers, baseball bats were used as murder weapons, as well as knives. During interrogation, Anoufriev admitted that he had dealt the first blows primarily, while Lytkin first began to mock the corpses. They finished off the victims together, inflicting anywhere from 15 to 20 blows. Since Anoufriev and Lytkin always attacked from behind, all the survivors of the "Molotchiki" could not tell the investigators any specific details that could immediately expose the criminals, because all of them at best saw them only briefly and did not even remember their voices. And although at court they recalled the same signs of the attackers and recognized that Anoufriev and Lytkin were very similar to them, they couldn't definitely recognize them.

• November 14, 2010 – Lytkin and Anoufriev attacked 18-year-old Anastasia Markovskaya while she was walking from the "19th school" stop in the direction of the Novo-Irkutsky village, and smashed her head. The girl remained alive, as the killers were frightened off (according to other sources, she pretended to be dead). OM-2 officers from the Irkutsk Police Department did not initiate a criminal case, citing the fact that Markovskaya was not robbed, although she was even ready to described the attackers. Meanwhile, Markovskaya herself reported on the Akademgorodok Internet forum. The criminals, after reading the message, began to correspond with her, being especially interested in what she felt when she was beaten.
• November 24, 2010 – Anoufriev and Lytkin attacked a 46-year-old woman, and then stole her bag. This time a criminal case was initiated, but only for robbery.
• December 1, 2010 – Anoufriev and Lytkin attacked another woman, but, frightened by witnesses, they ran away, taking her bag. In the bag were 500 rubles, with which they later bought mallets. After some time, they saw 12-year-old Danil Semyonov, who studied in the same school as them. Semyonov was going for a ride on a hill with his snow-scooter. Nikita, noticing the boy, offered Artyom to kill him, to which he agreed. According to Anoufriev, Lytkin likened Semyonov as a weak victim, unable to provide strong resistance. After catching the child, Lytkin stunned him from behind with a blow to the head with the mallet, and when he fell, Anoufriev continued to beat him with a baseball bat. On Danil's hand a hematoma was found – obviously, he either defended himself, or one the killers sharply grabbed his arm. The final part of the murder was a penknife, which Lytkin drove into Danil's temple by the handle. When the victim's mother and brother found the child, he was still alive. An ambulance team was called to the scene, but they got stuck in a traffic jam, and by the time of arrival the boy had already died. At that time, Semyonov's parents did not think that their son could have been a murder victim. Similarly, the experts considered the case an accident, writing everything off that the boy allegedly hit a birch tree at very high speeds. However, the hill's slope on which he rode was 10 degrees, the boy's snow scooter was undamaged, and according to former investigator Maxim Khomyak, who was involved in the case, had nothing at all in the snow on which Semyonov could've smashed his head on. No criminal case was started, which is why for some time Semyonov was not associated with the murderers. Later, Lytkin and Anoufriev admitted that they simply "trained" on the boy. Semyonov was their first killed victim.
• December 16, 2010 – twenty meters from the place where Semyonov was killed, the body of 69-year-old Olga Mikhailova Pirog, a leading researcher at the Research institute for Solar and Terrestrial Physics, was found. The woman, as it turned out, was killed in the same way as Semyonov, but this time she was murdered quickly, which was later done with the other victims. On her body, 30 knife wounds were counted, but money and jewelry were untouched. For some time, it was mistakenly believed that Pirog was the first victim killed by the pair, since Semyonov's death was recognized as an accident. In the course of this attack, the criminals made an audio recording, on which they first discussed how they would kill her, and then recorded the murder process.
• December 29, 2010 – at first, the "Molotchiki" attacked Inessa Valentinovna Svetlova, who managed to miraculously escape—they just took her bag, which they then threw away. Then, at 7 o'clock in the morning (an hour after the attack on Svetlova), the coach of the local sports school, 22-year-old Yekaterina Karpova, who was pregnant, was returning home to the private sector near Akademgorodok together with her 6-year-old niece Olya Averina. She encountered Anoufriev and Lytkin near the railway, but did not pay attention to them because she was talking on her mobile phone. The pair then attacked them when they crossed the railroad. Olya managed to escape; however, Lytkin had managed to hit her in the sides (the girl was later diagnosed with an extensive hematoma in the liver area). Yekaterina, despite the fact that she screamed that she was pregnant, had her fingers snapped and her head smashed in, but suddenly a car leaving from behind the nearest corner scared off the killers, which saved Yekaterina's life and pregnancy. In the emergency room of the hospital where she was taken, Yekaterina saw Svetlova with similar injuries.
• January 1, 2011 – around 5 o'clock in the morning, Anoufriev and Lytkin attacked a homeless man who was alone near some garbage cans on Lermontov Street, inflicting about 40 blows to him and smashing his head with their mallets. He later died in hospital; authorities couldn't establish his identity, and in the case he was listed as "Corpse No. 20".
• January 30, 2011 – Anoufriev and Lytkin attacked student Oleg Semyonov, who was returning home late at night from the "Stratosphere" night club. Semyonov managed to escape, and later doctors diagnosed him with bruised head wounds, a brain concussion and traumatic brain injuries.
• February 3, 2011 – The "Molotchiki" attacked an elderly woman, who was later taken to the hospital with an open head injury.
• Night of February 8–9, 2011 – The pair attacked another woman who survived, because the killers were frightened off from a passing car.
• February 21, 2011 – Alexander Petrovich Maximov, who was drunk and returning home from visiting his sister, was killed by the pair. The man had his jaw and head completely broken. Lytkin had shot him in the head with a Baikal Air pistol, and Anoufriev tried to remove the injured eyeballs, but couldn't do it because of his ignorance towards human anatomy, although the newspaper CM Number One subsequently quoted Anoufriev as saying during an investigative experiment that the victim had tried to gnaw out Lytkin's eyes. Maximov was buried in a closed coffin and decapitated, with remnants of his skull later becoming tangible evidence.
• February 27, 2011 – Lytkin single-handedly attacked Nina Kuzmina, who was sitting on a bench on Lermontov Street. He hit her twice on the head, but the woman made a fuss, which is why Alexander Chervyakov, who lived next door, looked out the window. Lytkin, frightened, ran away, taking the woman's mobile phone with him.
• Night of March 10–11, 2011 – on the footpath near the "State University" bus stop, not far from Anoufriev's house, the criminals attacked another homeless person, Roman Faizullin. Anoufriev shot the man twice in the face, after which, together with Lytkin, they dragged the body into some bushes and began stabbing him in the head, groin and chest with knives. Lytkin tried to cut off the hand, but due to the fact that the knife was small, he managed to cut off only the little finger. Later, Anoufriev photographed the corpse, behind which a bloody trail was shown, from the window of his apartment.
• Unknown date – Anoufriev and Lytkin attacked a homeless woman. She survived, since the criminals were frightened off by a police officer who saw them from the window of his apartment.
• Unknown date – The "Molotchiki" attacked a woman at an archgate; at the investigative experiment Anoufriev said that this time he had used a screwdriver instead of a knife. Since it was a crowded place, the pair, fearing to attract attention, did not kill her and ran away, taking her bag.
• April 3, 2011 – The last victim of the criminals, 63-year-old homeless woman Alevtina Kuydina, was killed near a research institute. Anoufriev and Lytkin first killed her, then filmed themselves mocking her corpse. On the video, shot by Anoufriev, Lytkin cut off the woman's earlobe with a knife, after which he wanted to cut off her wrists and eyeballs, but this did not work out for him, and then he threw the knife straight into the woman's eye and began to stab her repeatedly in the face. Later, they threw the earlobe on a porch of the school in which they studied. The video recording Anoufriev later sent to his online "friend of interest" from St. Petersburg, Ilya Ustinov (he was known by the nickname "Solomon Gojo" on the Internet), who found the video sluggish, but still distributed it all over the Internet; because of this, the Irkutsk police for some time checked for leaks of information, since an erroneous version of the video itself was distributed over to the police themselves.

Možní komplicové

In October 2012, a 27-year-old Vladimir from Krasnoyarsk Krai spoke at the trial, admitting that he was Anoufriev's "second friend", with whom he agreed on the basis of common extremist views. The young man confessed that at one time Artyom told him about three of the murders and had even taken him two times to "hunt", which, however, both times ended in nothing. For the first time, Vladimir agreed to go, because he did not believe that Anoufriev and Lytkin were behind the killings, and when he realized that they weren't lying, he did not report it to the police, because he was afraid that they would kill him and the girl who lived next door to Anoufriev. Vladimir also stated that a few days before the murder, Lytkin had received a subpoena in the army in connection to coming of age, to which Anoufriev casually told Vladimir that "Lytkin will have to be killed so that he will not be burned."

On March 6, 2013, Lytkin unexpectedly stated at the trial that Anoufriev did not take part in four of the crimes. In particular, he hadn't killed Olga Pirog, and instead there was another person there with Lytkin, with whom he committed two of the attacks, and in the fourth they were joined by another accomplice. The defendant called their names, but the press did not disclose them; however, they did confirm that the accomplice in the fourth crime had been a witness. The investigation was on the verge of renewal, when on March 13, Lytkin, again, unexpectedly, admitted that he had no accomplices. He declined to say why he had slandered the innocent, but the media suggested that in this way he wanted to delay the investigation. His mother said that he had done it to shield Anoufriev—on dates in the detention center Lytkin once told his mother that "they had made the devil out of Artyom" and he, Lytkin, "is so white and fluffy." Anoufriev said that the investigator had pressured Nikita, threatening him with a transfer to a solitary cell. Lytkin's mother denied a statement from Anoufriev, saying that at those early interrogations where she was present, the investigators had never pressed her son, and that she did not see the point that they would pressure him now.

Sociální sítě

In addition to the attacks, Anoufriev and Lytkin were active in social networks. Without concealing themselves, they described their crimes and even framed their gravity. On his personal pages on social networks, Anoufriev wrote: "We are gods, deciding who will live and who will die." The young men also led "recruiting conversations" with a number of users who visited their pages and groups. In a correspondence with a certain Yura Anoufriev, he suggested that the interlocutor try and kill the janitor for "training" and "training the psyche"; during the trial, Artyom stated that his account was being corresponded by an acquaintance who had access to it. Later during the investigation, when all the users with whom Anoufriev and Lytkin communicated were interrogated, it turned out that most of them simply did not believe the criminals, believing that they were taking on other people's murders in order to attract attention. The entire correspondence of Anoufriev, seized during the investigation, was 8 volumes in the form of 4,600 pages of printed text, which remained classified until the end of the trial.

Vyšetřování

On March 11, after the body of the next victim of the "Molotchniki" was found, a rally was held in Akademgorodok on what measures should be taken regarding the events taking place. By that time, there was already information that the killers were from age 16 to 18. Anoufriev and Lytkin also attended the meeting, offering ideas and videotaping it on a mobile phone. Meanwhile, constant patrols were conducted in the area. Special squads were created, and the crime rate decreased markedly, but did not lead to the killers' capture. Meanwhile, in Akademgorodok there was a panic caused by misinformation about the killings, which is why most common version among citizens was that it was a single maniac and he was about 30 years old. Anoufriev and Lytkin never once came under suspicion, because, according to the words of investigator Maxim Khomyak, "everyone looked for strangers. And these guys were their own in Akademgorodok."

Zatčení a uvěznění

Olga Lipchinskaya, a journalist of Komsomolskaya Pravda, a month before the arrest of the "Molotchniki", when, accordingly, no one could establish their identities, gave this description of the "Academy Maniac": „Akademovsky residents think they are afraid of a killer maniac or teenagers hooked up on a bloody craft. There are no other versions about the one who kills. And a certain spiderman sitting at a computer at home in genuinely amused, knowing how much people are afraid of HIM. In fact, hundreds of people, precisely according to HIS reports of victims, are gathering in the squares, organizing people's guards, are afraid to take to the streets. OH, this person feels like a winner. We have a century of the Internet, gentlemen. “

On January 15, 2011, on suspicion of murdering the unknown homeless man, the homeless 19-year-old Vladimir Bazilevsky, who had blood on his clothes, was detained. On the night of January 1, Bazilevsky, according to his statements, had spent in a sewer well, but the operative who interrogated him began to convince him otherwise using beatings. According to Bazilevsky, the investigator literally knocked out a murder confession from him, forcing him to write it down. The name of murdered—Andrei, nicknamed "Taiga"—Bazilevsky gave under pressure: that was the name of one of his friends. During the investigative experiment, Bazilevsky explained how the murder took place and where the body laid, taking his testimony to the camera. In fact, based on results from a biological examination, which showed the blood of the murdered and the blood on Bazilevsky's clothes matched, Judge Andrei Obyskalov convicted Bazilevsky in April 2011, sentencing him to 4 years. Subsequently, investigator Yevgeny Karchevsky, while checking the man's testimony, found with the help of an investigator from the Sverdlovsk Oblast that the blood on Bazilevsky's clothes did not match the victim's. In addition to this, the investigators found that Andrei "Taiga" was actually alive. He asked the prosecutor's office to reconsider the case, but he was refused. However, the lawyers of the human rights organization Public Verdict soon found out about it, because of which Karchevsky's second petition was granted. In May 2012, Bazilevsky, after one-and-a-half years' imprisonment, was released from prison, and all charges against him were dropped. The operative who pressed him was never found. Another officer, Yuri Fedorov, was accused of falsifying evidence and removed from work at the end of July. On October 9, 2014, he was sentenced to three years with 2 years prohition of holding posts in state and municipal services. Fedorov did not admit guilt and filed an appeal, after which in February 2015 his sentence was canceled and sent for review. For the illegal sentence, Bazilevsky's lawyer demanded compensation from the state amounting to 3 million rubles, but as a result, on November 19, 2013, the Sverdlovsk District Court of Irkutsk ordered the state to pay only 300,000 rubles.

Soud

Jednání

Vazební věznice No. 1 v Irkutsku

On August 12, 2012, the Investigative Committee transferred the case of Anoufriev and Lytkin to the Irkutsk Regional Court. Officially, the judicial investigation of the case lasted from September 5, 2012 to February 11, 2013, during this period 16 victims and more than 50 witnesses were questioned.

On September 5, 2012, the consideration of the case began, which eventually amounted to 49 volumes (according to other data, 46 and 35 volumes). At the meeting, the court granted Anoufriev's petition to have another lawyer enter the case, in connection with which the court hearing was postponed until September 10; thus, during the trial, the defendants were represented by three lawyers (Lytkin by one and Anoufriev by two).

The meeting on September 10 began with announcement of the indictment, which the prosecutor read out for an hour and a half. In total, Anoufriev and Lytkin were charged with six murders, nine attempted murders, three robberies and desecration of the bodies of the dead. In addition to the killings, the "Molotchniki" were incriminated in the creation of an extremist community. Separately, Artyom Anoufriev was charged with 14 counts of engaging a minor in criminal activities (Lytkin had 17 for almost all the killings). Anoufriev refused to admit his guilt for the involvement, extremism, attempted murders, robberies and mockery of the corpses, and of the six murder charges against him, he agreed only with two—the murders of Pirog and Kuydina. Lytkin, on the contrary, only rejected the extremism charge.

In Irkutsk's reman prison No. 1, Anoufriev was placed in a common cell, and Lytkin in a double room. Although the forensic psychiatric examination found both sane, the Anoufriev SIZO was registered as prone to self-mutilation and suicide, and psychologists carried out separate work with him. During the investigative experiment, the suspects were accompanied by twenty operatives because of the fear that local residents would attack them. Danil Semyonov's father wanted to be present at the experiment, but he was not allowed in an attempt to avoid a mob trial. Anoufriev was present only at the verbal identification of the experiment, the technical verification was carried out only by Lytkin. Subsequently, the defendants were placed in different solitary cells, since there was information about a planned murder against both.

The trial was very difficult psychologically. Because of the wide publicity of the criminal case, some witnesses and victims refused to testify, and others did not want to remind themselves of the tragedy. During the trial, several times the court had to declare breaks due to the witnesses fainting. At the trial, Anoufriev, at first, behaved very cynically and carefully outlined the interviews of witnesses, which caused their discontent, but at some point he lost his courage and burst into tears twice in the hall, finally giving his testimony, trying to pin all the murders on Lytkin, claiming that he was only present at the time of the murder, but did not do anything. Vladimir's testimony (that he knew about the crimes, but remained silent because he feared Anoufriev would kill him) provoked indignation in Artyom and he denied it all, mentioning that Vladimir had allegedly killed a Caucasian in his time, and at the same time he offered Artyom to injure his girlfriend when he quarreled with her. Vladimir, in response, admitted that he actually lied about the murder, so as not to fall out in the eyes of the skinheads (in his words, at the time of trial, he had already departed from them) and denied all accusations against Anoufriev who, at the end of the trial, became firmly insistent that he was involved only in the murders of Pirog and Kuydina. Lytkin, throughout the whole process, looked aloof and behaved inexpressively. One time, after a 4-hour testimony, his head ached, because of which the interrogation was postponed another day, but at the end of the proceedings he began to give short answers with many pauses.

On October 16, 2012, Anoufriev, while in court, inflicted cut wounds to the side of his neck and scratched his stomach with a razor, which he carried in his sock when he was taken from prison to court. He could not explain why he did it. His lawyer Svetlana Kukareva considered this the result of a strong emotional outburst, which was caused by the fact that his mother first appeared in court that day. The media mentioned the case when Anoufriev, in front of one of the meetings, cut his neck with a screw, unscrewed from the sink in the convoy room.

Anufrijevovy stížnosti

On November 6, 2012, Anoufriev filed a complaint against the operatives and investigators of the OP-2 Akademgorodok, accusing them of cruel psychological and physical treatment during the arrest and no less cruel treatment during his time in the cell. According to him, he made confessions to the murders under pressure from police officers, and after the incident on October 16 in the temporary detention cell in which he was taking breaks during the trial, the escorts handcuffed him to the window bars. Anoufriev also filed a complaint that he did not receive materials on the case, and that on October 3, through guards, he was in the same compartment of a special car with a pair of skinheads who, while also being arrested, were witnesses in the case. The inspection on the fact of self-mutilation did not reveal any irregularities in the actions of the police: it was established that the handcuffs were applied to Anoufriev in accordance with the federal law "On Police", and that there was no indication in his personal file about the need for separate maintenance from other prisoners. Nevertheless, his lawyers noted that a few days after his arrest, the examination recorded an abrasion in the region of the crown of Anoufriev's head, inflicted by a tangential blow of a hard blunt object.

At the beginning of December, at the court hearing, a video was shown of Anoufriev's testimony at the investigative experiment, after which the judge asked the defendant whether he confirms it. However, Anoufriev refuted his words regarding the murder of the homeless man, committed on the night of March 10–11. He wouldn't have been able to into the pneumatics even from two steps, and then testified about the attacks which involved a knife. Artyom stated that he told all this in the investigative experiment only because the authorities ordered him to do so. When the judge asked him why he was silent about this matter, Anoufriev replied that he did not have the right to vote, and his lawyer was "sitting like furniture in his office." Then he announced that he was beaten and humiliated by cellmates in the SIZO cell, and when he decided to change his lawyer, he was told it wasn't worth it. He also stated that the protocol for checking testimonies on the spot took place on April 11 (according to other data—April 4) of 2011, and was signed by another person on his behalf. At the request of the public prosecutor, a handwriting examination was appointed, which was entrusted to the Irkutsk forensic laboratory. This was one of the reasons for the delay in the judicial investigation. The examination acknowledged that Anoufriev's signature was genuine, which caused many objections from the latter, who continued to insist that he did not sign the protocols.

From the very beginning of the trial, Anoufriev firmly insisted on his non-involvement in the killings (he confessed only to the murders of Pirog and Kuydina), referring to the fact that his case was never proven guilty. When Lytkin announced that Artyom was not involved in the four other murders, the latter began to request that the investigator visit Lytkin and interrogate the convoy on duty. The court denied this, but granted the prosecution's petition—from now on, the killers were separated from the courtroom, while communication between them was excluded.

Odsouzení

On February 13, 2013, a judicial debate began about Anoufriev and Lytkin's case. First in the debate was the public prosecutor, who, taking into account all the evidence examined at the court session and the position of the defendants, asked the court to find the defendants guilty and sentence Anoufriev to life imprisonment in a strict regime correctional colony, and Lytkin to 25 years' imprisonment serving the sentence in a strict regime colony. In addition, the prosecutor eventually refused to file charges against Anoufriev for involvement in a criminal activities as a minor, justifying his refusal by saying that the age difference between Anoufriev and Lytkin was only six months.

On February 25, the lawyers of the defendants spoke at the debate. Anoufriev's lawyers asked the court to acquit him, and they didn't take into account the two counts of murder in which he pleaded guilty, referring to the fact that during the murder of the homeless man, Anoufriev was recording with the camera, and the audio recording of Pirog's murder was impossible to establish that he also took part in it. In turn, Lytkin's lawyer insisted on reducing the term of the latter to 20 years' imprisonment.

The defendants's last words were scheduled for March 12, 2013, but it failed, since, according to them, they weren't ready. Then Anoufriev was transferred the next day, but even then they weren't ready, and as a result it took place on March 18. Lytkin refused the right to a last word. Without interrupting, Anoufriev read a prepared text, in which he again asked for forgiveness from the victims, once again rejecting accusations against him: „Thanks to the media on me now is a stain from which I can't wash off. My grandfather was a veteran of the Great Patriotic War, and they call me a fascist - the ones from whom he defended us. The materials of the case didn't prove my fault. I plead guilty only in the murder of Olga Pirog, as well as in the mockery of the corpse, but only in the fact that I shot the camera. In all other crimes did not participate. It may sound silly, but I myself do not understand why I did it. I do not know what came over me. Sincereley condolences. I believe that there are no people of our age who could not be corrected. You can fix any person at any age. There would be a desire. I have this desire. “

On April 2, 2013, the Irkutsk Regional Court sentenced Anoufriev to life imprisonment with serving in a special regime colony, Lytkin to 24 years' imprisonment, of which five years (three years, since he took two years before his sentence was taken into account) was to be held in prison, and the rest—in a strict regime colony. After Lytkin's liberation, another year will be restricted in movement with the prohibition to leave the territory of the place and travel abroad. The sentence, which had about 150 pages, was read out for 8 hours, during which one of those present in the hall—a man who, during the killings, was among the combatants patrolling Akademgorodok—fell into a swoon. Anoufriev looked indifferently at the floor all the time, and Lytkin was visibly nervous but did not lower his eyes (he remained in this state when the sentence was read). Anoufriev, on the contrary, having heard the judge's verdict, fell on the bench and wept. After the announcement of the verdict, he shouted to the victims' families: "Well, are you satisfied?" (According to other sources, his words were addressed to investigator Yevgeny Karchevsky, who conducted the interrogation). In response, Danil Semyonov's mother, Svetlana, shouted at him: "And you were pleased when my son was killed, the 12-year-old child lying in the ground!" Lytkin did not respond to the verdict and did not look at Artyom. The verdict provoked harsh criticism from the victims, who felt that Lytkin deserved a similar life sentence. Svetlana Semyonova filed an appeal and personally wrote a letter to Vladimir Putin. Meanwhile, one of the surviving victims, Nina Kuzmina, considered the verdict against Lytkin fair, even though it was him who attacked her.

Around October 2013, the killers remained in Irkutsk's detention center. During this time, their lawyers challenged the decision of the regional court in the Supreme Court, where an appeal hearing was held on October 3, at which, by a decision from the Supreme Court, Lytkin's term was reduced from 24 years to 20, as his minor age was taken into account at the time of the majority of murders, and the appointment of a term of 5 years was considered unfounded. Anoufriev's sentence remained unchanged.

Odškodnění

In November 2012, the surviving Yekaterina Karpova sued Anoufriev and Lytkin in a civil suit for 1 million rubles. Then another two people filed a lawsuit—also one of the surviving victims, who estimated the damage at 800,000 rubles, and the son of Alevtina Kuydina, who also estimated the damage at 1 million rubles. During the announcement of the verdict, the Irkutsk Regional Court ruled that the total amount of compensation that the criminals had to pay is 2.75 million rubles, of which 500,000 rubles must be paid to Nina Kuzmina. State prosecutor Alexander Shkinev said that they would have to pay from the money they earn in prison, so they are unlikely to ever pay off his victims.

Následky

On January 27, 2014, Anoufriev was transferred to Ognenny Ostrov in the Vologda Oblast, where he became the youngest prisoner at the time. In April, journalists from Komsomolskaya Pravda interviewed him, in which he made it clear that he did not repent at all, did not consider himself guilty, and did not agree with the verdict. "Your colleagues helped me get here. I see you need something from me all the time," he said, further saying that he would only talk if he was paid. He added that his family is taking various measures by which he can be released on parole, but he does not count on it. Anoufriev also admitted that he was writing a book, without explaining what it was about.

On April 21, 2016, the Irkutsk Court partially granted Anoufriev's claim for compensation for non-pecuniary damage and collected money from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation in its favor. The amount of compensation wasn't reported.

In February 2017, Anoufriev stated in a report to NTV's infoshow True Gurnov that he was studying law at the University of Latvia.

Lytkin, allegedly, is serving his term in one of the colonies in the Irkutsk Oblast.

Oběti

• 1. prosinec 2010 – Daniil Semjonov (12 let)
• 16. prosinec 2010 – Olga Pirogová (69 let)
• 1. leden 2011 – neznámý bezdomovec
• 21. únor 2011 – Alexandr Maximov
• 11. březen 2011 – Roman Fajzullin
• 3. duben 2011 – Alevtina Kujdinová (63 let)

Odkazy

Reference

V tomto článku byl použit překlad textu z článku Academy maniacs na anglické Wikipedii.

Literatura

• Vaske, E. V.; Kurakinová, O. I. ИДЕОЛОГИЯ ЧЕЛОВЕКОНЕНАВИСТНИЧЕСТВА.ПСИХОЛОГО-ПРАВОВОЙ АНАЛИЗ СОВРЕМЕННЫХ ПРОЯВЛЕНИЙ ЭКСТРЕМИЗМА. In: Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Nižnij Novgorod: Нижегородский госуниверситет им. Н.И.Лобачевского, 2014. Dostupné online. S. 228–233. (rusky)
• Organization of an extremist community: problems of qualification and evidence: manual / P. V. Agapov, etc. .; by ed. V.V. Merkurieva; Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. – M. , 2013. – 248 p

Externí odkazy

• (red). Detainees in the case of serial murders in Irkutsk were neo-Nazis. Автоном [online]. 2011-04-09 [cit. 2020-11-02]. Dostupné online. (anglicky) 
• Interview s Anufrijevem (LifeNews)
• Dementěvová, Jekatěrina; Ruzanovová, Nina. Охотники за головами: Два подростка решили, что они "сверхчеловеки", и вышли с молотком искать свои жертвы. Rossijskaja gazeta [online]. 2013-04-14 [cit. 2020-11-02]. Dostupné online. (rusky) 
• ZVERINCEVOVÁ, Taťjana. «Вершили судьбы быдла»: В Иркутске вынесен приговор серийным убийцам. Lenta.ru [online]. 2013-04-02 [cit. 2020-11-02]. Dostupné online. (rusky) 
• Rozhodnutí o odvolání ze 3. října 2013, číslo jednací N 66-APU13-50. Databáze soudních rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu RF. (rusky)

Případ v Irkutsku

Dva ruští mladíci, Arťom Anufrijev a Nikita Lytkin, známí jako Akaděmovskije maňjaki (Академовские маньяки) byli 5. dubna 2011 uvězněni kvůli šesti vraždám a vražedným útokům na obyvatele Akaděmgorodku v Irkutsku. Útoky nožem a palicí začaly v prosinci 2010. Byli zatčeni poté, co byl v kameře patřící Lytkinovu strýci, který byl podezříván, nalezen videozáznam ukazující ženské tělo mrzačené nožem. Podle informací v médiích byli mladíci ovlivněni četbou o Dněpropetrovských maniacích na internetu. Psychiatrické vyšetření potvrdilo, že jsou příčetní. Lékařům řekli, že si vybírali slabé lidi. Rozsudek byl vynesen 2. dubna 2013, Anufrijev dostal doživotí, Lytkin 24 let.